Friday, June 1, 2018

Akiba Rubinstein X Emanuel Lasker - St Petersburg 1909

Rubinstein, Akiba2591Lasker, Emanuel26321–0D32St. PetersburgSt Petersburg1909
The Players Akiba Rubinstein (1882-1961) was one of the world’s best players in the period 1907-22. Born in the small Polish town of Stawiski, he learned chess at the age of 16 - unusually late for one who goes on to become a great player. A few years later he moved to Lodz and his chess developed rapidly. By 1907 he was already recognized as one of the leading masters and in the following five years he won a whole string of major international events. Rubinstein challenged Lasker for the World Championship and a match was arranged, but a poor performance by Rubinstein at St Petersburg 1914 followed by the outbreak of the First World War dashed his hopes of a title match. After the war years Rubinstein’s career continued successfully and in 1922 he agreed terms with Capablanca, who had taken the title away from Lasker the previous year. However, he was unable to raise the necessary finance and his hopes of becoming World Champion faded for ever. Rubinstein effectively retired from chess in 1932, with his mental health in poor shape. Destitution and the Second World War cast a further shadow over his declining years and he became one of the many great masters who suffered poverty and deprivation in later life. Emanuel Lasker (1868-1941) is one of the most famous chess players of all time. As a youngster Lasker showed incredible talent at both chess and mathematics and he fulfilled his potential in both fields. Lasker defeated Steinitz to become World Champion in 1894, a title he was to hold for twentyseven years, which is still a record. Despite his victory over Steinitz, the chess world remained unimpressed, chiefly as the former World Champion was 32 years older than Lasker and his health was declining. Lasker, however, was still improving. In 1896 he proved his worth without doubt by winning four successive major events, including the St Petersburg tournament. Lasker continued to have excellent results, before beating Steinitz in a return match in 1896/7. During his chess career he still found time to pursue his mathematical studies, and in 1900 he was awarded his doctorate at Erlangen University. In chess Lasker was an exceptional tactician, but more than anything he was an immensely resourceful fighter. On countless occasions he was able to turn inferior positions to his advantage and his defensive qualities were without equal. The Game Once more Lasker employs an inferior defence to the Queen’s Gambit, but unlike his game against Pillsbury, he doesn’t get a chance to correct his error this time. Rubinstein fails to find the most punishing continuation, but what he plays is certainly enough to secure a small plus. In typical fashion Lasker seeks complications, sacrificing a pawn to gain the initiative. Rubinstein accepts the pawn, perhaps unwisely, but for him this is the only questionable decision of the game. Faced with a defensive task, Rubinstein plays brilliantly, first to squash Lasker ’s counterplay and then to go onto the attack himself. Lasker is forced to enter a terrible endgame, which is the equivalent of resignation against someone of Rubinstein’s legendary technique. 1.d4 d5 2.f3 f6 3.c4 e6 4.g5 c5 [When this advance is made prematurely, the isolation of the d-pawn is the necessary consequence.] 5.cxd5 exd5 6.c3 cxd4 7.xd4 c6? 8.e3 e7 LiveBook: 3 Games 9.b5 [This move shows why Black's 7th was open to censure.] d7 White is slightly better. 10.xf6 10.0-0 is interesting. 0-0 11.e2 c8 12.c1 h6 13.h4 10...xf6 11.xd5 xd4 11...e5 12.0-0 0-0 13.xc6 bxc6 14.c3 e8 15.d2 c7 16.f3 f6 17.ac1 b7 18.c2 c5 19.a4 xa4 20.xa4 xb2 21.xc5 b7 22.fc1 ac8 23.h3 a6 24.c7 b8 25.d7 xc7 26.xc7 Rausis,I (2440)-Mellier,P St Martin 1991 1-0 (38) 12.exd4 g5 12...0-0 13.0-0 a6 14.xc6 xc6 15.e3 f6 16.d5 b5 17.e1 fd8 18.b3 ab8 19.a4 d7 20.ac1 b5 21.a5 bc8 22.b4 e8 23.d2 d6 24.b4 h6 25.d4 e5 26.xe5 xe5 27.xc8+ Polich,S (2054)-Klubal,J (1761) Pardubice 2017 1-0 (46) 13.xc6 xc6 14.e3N 14.e2+ d7 15.e3 xg2 16.g1 a5+ 17.d2 xd2+ 18.xd2 e4 19.c4 g6 20.ac1 f6 21.f4 hg8 22.e3 e4 23.c5 b6 24.h5 ac8 25.f5 h6 26.h4 ce8 27.hg4 e7 28.g6 c7 Shocron,R-Humerez Estrada,C Mar del Plata/ Buenos Aires 1954 1/2-1/2 (66) 14...0-0-0 14...xg2= 15.g1 a5+ 16.d2 xd2+ 17.xd2 e4 15.0-0 he8 Threatens to win with ...Rxe3. 16.c1! [A move of extraordinary subtlety. White now retains his advantages. He threatens Rc1-c5 and d4-d5, and Black's obvious threat of 16...Rxe3 he meets as is shown by his 17th move.] xe3
17.xc6+! bxc6 18.c1‼ The whole point of Rubinstein’s previous play, beginning with 16. Rc1. The rook is pinned to the queen and cannot be saved. xd4 19.fxe3± Endgame KQR-KQR d7 20.xc6+ d8 21.f4! Rubinstein plays the rest of the game in a faultless manner. By placing his rook on the fourth rank White threatens to decide the issue immediately by smoking the black king out into the open. Black is in trouble. f5 21...d1+± was necessary. 22.f2 a5 22.c5 Threatening mate with Qf8+. e7 Lasker is forced into a lost ending. 23.xe7+ Wrong is 23.xf5? xe3+ 24.h1 xf4!-+ 23...xe7 24.xf5 KR-KR d1+
25.f2! Classic technique. White gives up one of his extra pawns to activate his king. d2+ 26.f3 xb2 27.a5 b7
28.a6! Another excellent move. The a6-square is the ideal place for the white rook. Now the black rook remains tied to the a7-pawn, while the black king cannot move onto the third rank. Black can now only sit and wait while White gradually pushes his king and pawns up the board. f8 29.e4 c7 30.h4 f7 31.g4 f8 32.f4 e7 33.h5! The white pawns slowly move up the board. Lasker now decided to prevent any further advance, but in doing so created a specific weakness on g6. h6? Nevertheless, passive defence also loses, although some accurate play is required by White. 33...e8 was worth a try. 34.e5 f7 34.f5+- f7 35.e5 b7 35...g8 36.e6 f8 36.d6 e7 37.a6 f7 38.d6 Repeating the position is merely a tease for Lasker. Rubinstein is merely marking time before the final finesse. f8 39.c6 f7 40.a3 . Lessons from this game: 1) Brilliant defence can be just as powerful and imaginative as brilliant attack. Rubinstein’s concept, culminating with 18. Qc1, is proof of this. 2) Rook activity and king activity are powerful tools in the endgame. Witness Rubinstein’s 25. Kf2! and 28. Ra6!. 3) Rubinstein was the absolute master of rook and pawn endgames. Accuracy: White = 82%, Black = 38%.
1–0

No comments: